User friendly firewall for a small office

Hi,

Recently we have migrated all of our production to Microsoft Azure. I have site where 4 peoples work. Since, now we are in cloud considering to them direct access to our file server in Microsoft Azure. While searching on internet I found out the Site to Site connection is the best approach to access azure server.

So, I need a firewall router recommended which is compatible with Microsoft Azure. It must be user friendly as we don’t have IT person or any other IT consult there to give frequent troubleshooting.

2 Likes

Hi @NaveenD,

There are many good brand I can name you but you have asked user friendly then my recommendation will go to Fortinet products. For a small office you can buy FG60E which is officially supported VPN device by azure. One of my clients use this product for more than 4 years I think and he also has multiple devices. Occasionally I ask him (I always get the feedbacks from my clients occasionally) his reply with very satisfied and also he is non technical person.

1 Like

Hey there!
Cohesive Networks VNS3 is a security and network routing virtual appliance built for Azure.

  • Hybrid Cloud Network Device - 7 Network Devices in One
  • Cloud Native Networking since 2008
  • Control IP Addressing, Network Topologies, and Multicast with Overlay Networking
  • Create Scalable, High Availability, Multi-Cloud Networks
  • Add Layer 4-7 Network Services via Docker Integration
  • Flexible Solution for All Major Industries Including: Government, Finance, Healthcare, ISV, Retail, Software Integrators, Mobile/Telecom, & more.
  • Connect to any Device VNS3:net supports most IPsec data center solutions: Preferred Most models from Cisco Systems*, Juniper, Watchguard, Dell SONICWALL, Netgear, Fortinet, Barracuda Networks, Check Point*, Zyxel USA, McAfee Retail, Citrix Systems, Hewlett Packard, D-Link, WatchGuard, Palo Alto Networks, OpenSwan, pfSense, and Vyatta.Best Effort Any IPsec device that supports: IKE1 or IKE2, AES256 or AES128 or 3DES, SHA1 or MD5, and most importantly NAT-Traversal standards.*Known Exclusions Checkpoint R65+ requires native IPSec connections as Checkpoint does not conform to NAT-Traversal Standards and Cisco ASA 8.4(2)-8.4(4) bugs prevent a stable connection from being maintained.
1 Like

Cisco ofrece soluciones a la nube bastante buenas y hay otra soluciones en en el mercado también bastante buenas

1 Like