Hi,
Recently we have migrated all of our production to Microsoft Azure. I have site where 4 peoples work. Since, now we are in cloud considering to them direct access to our file server in Microsoft Azure. While searching on internet I found out the Site to Site connection is the best approach to access azure server.
So, I need a firewall router recommended which is compatible with Microsoft Azure. It must be user friendly as we don’t have IT person or any other IT consult there to give frequent troubleshooting.
2 Likes
Hi @NaveenD,
There are many good brand I can name you but you have asked user friendly then my recommendation will go to Fortinet products. For a small office you can buy FG60E which is officially supported VPN device by azure. One of my clients use this product for more than 4 years I think and he also has multiple devices. Occasionally I ask him (I always get the feedbacks from my clients occasionally) his reply with very satisfied and also he is non technical person.
1 Like
Hey there!
Cohesive Networks VNS3 is a security and network routing virtual appliance built for Azure.
- Hybrid Cloud Network Device - 7 Network Devices in One
- Cloud Native Networking since 2008
- Control IP Addressing, Network Topologies, and Multicast with Overlay Networking
- Create Scalable, High Availability, Multi-Cloud Networks
- Add Layer 4-7 Network Services via Docker Integration
- Flexible Solution for All Major Industries Including: Government, Finance, Healthcare, ISV, Retail, Software Integrators, Mobile/Telecom, & more.
-
Connect to any Device VNS3:net supports most IPsec data center solutions: Preferred Most models from Cisco Systems*, Juniper, Watchguard, Dell SONICWALL, Netgear, Fortinet, Barracuda Networks, Check Point*, Zyxel USA, McAfee Retail, Citrix Systems, Hewlett Packard, D-Link, WatchGuard, Palo Alto Networks, OpenSwan, pfSense, and Vyatta.Best Effort Any IPsec device that supports: IKE1 or IKE2, AES256 or AES128 or 3DES, SHA1 or MD5, and most importantly NAT-Traversal standards.*Known Exclusions Checkpoint R65+ requires native IPSec connections as Checkpoint does not conform to NAT-Traversal Standards and Cisco ASA 8.4(2)-8.4(4) bugs prevent a stable connection from being maintained.
1 Like
Cisco ofrece soluciones a la nube bastante buenas y hay otra soluciones en en el mercado también bastante buenas
1 Like